Narrow focus beats a big unfocused site, every time
The clearest lesson from building my own sites: pick a small, specific target, cover it completely, and split the content by type. On iBorderTerrier.com I went all in on one dog breed. On mybowlingday.com a single well-scoped page ranks for 186 keyword variations at once. Neither is a giant, and that is the point. Focus plus a clean content split, roughly 80% information, 15% reviews, 5% everything else, out-ranks a broad site that is a mile wide and an inch deep.
Migrations are where rankings go to die
The most expensive mistake in SEO is shipping a redesign or replatform without a redirect map and a measurement plan. The new site looks great and the traffic is gone. The rule: treat a migration as a search project first and a design project second. Map every URL, watch the logs, and do not call it done until the curves recover.
The content that ranks is rarely the content you are proud of
Teams fall in love with the clever launch page and neglect the boring guide that answers an actual question. Search rewards the boring guide. Write for the question someone is really asking, in the words they really use, and it will outperform the prettier page almost every time.
Most 'algorithm updates' are you noticing your own neglect
Every major update gets blamed for traffic drops that were building for months. Dig into the logs and the decline usually started long before the update. The update did not cause it, it revealed it. Measure continuously and most of the surprises disappear.
AI search did not kill SEO, it raised the bar
The same fundamentals that win on Google, clear structure, real expertise, being genuinely citable, are exactly what get you cited by an answer engine. GEO is not a different religion. It is SEO with the volume turned up and the margin for fluff turned down.
Nobody got fired for chasing volume, and that is the problem
Big keyword volume looks great in a deck and converts like wet cardboard. The pages that pay the bills are almost always the lower-volume, higher-intent queries that the volume chasers ignore. Intent beats volume, and it is not close.
Your competitors are not your benchmark, the SERP is
It is easy to burn a quarter trying to out-publish a competitor who is also guessing. Stop. The benchmark is what already ranks and what already gets cited, not what the other company is doing. Read the results, not the rumor mill.
The boring technical fix usually beats the clever content idea
Given a choice between a brilliant content campaign and fixing the reason half your site cannot be crawled or rendered, fix the crawl first. A redirect map and a render fix recover more traffic than most single pieces of content. Foundations are unsexy, and they win.
More field notes go out in the newsletter before they ever land here.
Get the newsletter